Independent scientists Scott & Ann Swengel began surveying butterflies in 1986 in Wisconsin. They quickly expanded their incredibly productive survey program to include Minnesota, North Dakota, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri. Most of their surveys in states other than Wisconsin were conducted in the 1980s and 1990s over multiple consecutive years. Some of their past and present surveys target sensitive species like Regal Fritillary and Frosted Elfin, and/or sensitive habitats like muskegs and native prairies. One goal of their work is to seek out new locations and previously unknown populations. In Wisconsin alone, for example, they have surveyed over 250 sites, and many sites continue to receive at least annual surveys.
Swengel & Swengel Surveys
Snapshot
Protocol
Program Results
Roel Van Klink, Diana E. Bowler, Konstantin B. Gongalsky, Ann B. Swengel, Alessandro Gentile, Jonathan M. Chase 2020. Meta-Analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances. Science 24 April 2020: Volume 368, Issue 6489:417-420. DOI: 10.1126/science.aax9931 Supplementary materials: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2020/04/22/368.6489.417.DC1
Erratum for the Report “Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances” by R. Van Klink, D. E. Bowler, K. B. Gongalsky, A. B. Swengel, A. Gentile, J. M. Chase. Science 23 Oct 2020: Vol. 370, Issue 6515
Response to Comment on “Meta-analysis reveals declines in terrestrial but increases in freshwater insect abundances”. 2020. Roel van Klink, Diana E. Bowler, Konstantin B. Gongalsky, Ann B. Swengel, Jonathan M. Chase. Science 10.1126/science.abe0760
Swengel, Scott R. and Ann B. Swengel 2015. Assessing abundance patterns of specialized bog butterflies over 12 years in northern Wisconsin USA. Journal of Insect Conservation 19:293-304. DOI 10.1007/s10841-014-9731-8 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-014-9731-8
. Journal of Insect Conservation 15:327-339
Swengel A, and SR Swengel. 1999. . Great Lakes Entomologist 32(1-2):79-95
